RedLine Language Services LLC

Document creation, editing, and translation

  • Home
  • Prices
  • Contact
  • June 18, 2013
Home > Typography/Design > London 2012 font: A critique

London 2012 font: A critique

July 29, 2012 By Matthew Kushinka

The London 2012 font is a “bespoke” (custom) font. Called “2012 Headline,” it was designed specifically for the Olympic Games by the branding firm Wolff Olins. See why the London 2012 font is so ugly.

London 2012 font

The font used for the 2012 Oympic and Paralympic Games is called '2012 Headline.'


Why is the London 2012 font so ugly?

Many fonts are unattractive, but they at least work in context (think the 11-year-old who makes a sign for her lemonade stand using Comic Sans). But Headline 2012 is ugly and inappropriate.

On the plus side, people find the London 2012 font memorable. But that may not be a compliment. After all, the Hindenburg disaster was “memorable.”

 
The Olympic Games conjure up words like “tradition,” “pageantry,” and “patriotism.” The London 2012 font, by contrast, looks—well—goofy.

  • It is an oblique (italic) face, meaning the letters slope to the right. Italics should be used sparingly, usually to show emphasis or set off non-dialogue words or sentences. The use of an italic face without the dominant backdrop of a roman (non-italic) face is strange.
  • In the logo, the L in “London” is lowercase, not uppercase. London is a capital city. Is a capital letter too much to ask?
  • The 2s look like Zs. In fact, the Iranians thought that the 2 in the logo was indeed a Z (and that the …012 was …ion). Yup, Iran demanded the logo be changed because it clearly spelled Zion. (And some say that the logo looks like Lisa Simpson engaging in oral sex.)
  • The London 2012 font is jagged. Look at the steep climb that the transverse stroke of the n makes, only to drop off a cliff when it descends. When I think of Olympic-caliber athletes, I think “fast” or “strong”—not “jagged.”

London 2012 font

For the athletes it is, sure. But not for the font. Image: Matthew Smith

 

Alternatives for the London 2012 font

Well, just about anything would have been preferable to Headline 2012. The London 2012 font should have been classy, yet not pompous. Cool, yet not avant-garde. The London committee should have gone with Kino Design, the firm that designed the logo for London’s Olympic bid. That logo was at least context-appropriate.

Ask us a question about fonts

Like this post? Then follow RedLine on Facebook for more articles on fonts, words, and language.


 
london 2012 font
 

Matthew Kushinka is the founder and principal of RedLine Language Services LLC. Based in Grand Rapids, Michigan, the company helps commercial clients create, revise, and translate their written content. Send your questions or comments to matthew@redlinels.com or connect with Matthew on Google+, LinkedIn, Facebook, or Twitter.


Tweet
Filed Under: Typography/Design Tagged With: 2012 Olympic Games, 2012 Olympics, font, Headline 2012, London 2012 logo, Olympic logo, typeface, Wolff Olins

Languages

  • en  English

FAQ

Tips

Testimonials

Recent projects

   

Our story

Our team

Our publications

Posts by category

  • Company News (18)
  • Language and Culture (32)
  • Language Learning (8)
  • Linguistics (18)
  • Surveys (2)
  • Technology (13)
  • Testimonials (7)
  • Tips (12)
  • Translation (14)
  • Typography/Design (3)
  • Uncategorized (2)
  • Writing (19)

Archived Posts

Useful Links

American Translators Association
Grand Rapids Area Chamber of Commerce

Follow us

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on LinkedIn

Contact Us

RedLine Language Services LLC
(616) 855-4044 (U.S. clients)
+001 616 855-4044 (international clients)
Hours: Monday - Friday, 9 am - 5 pm EST
info@redlinels.com

Return to top of page

Copyright © 2013 RedLine Language Services LLC · Log in

  • en English
  • es Español
  • fr Français